![]() ![]() |
Jul 10 2007, 09:43 PM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Forum Addict ![]() Group: Basic Arbiters Posts: 1,140 Joined: 27-February 07 From: Gloucestershire, England. Member No.: 171 |
They're all pretty awesome, the latest one especially so.
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2007, 11:23 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Forum Compulsive ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 784 Joined: 19-September 06 From: *Insert Witty Answer Here* Member No.: 96 |
QUOTE(keychain4 @ Jul 10 2007, 09:26 PM) I've managed to get another one done now, only this time I slightly edited it to boost colour saturation in the sky. This was taken only a few hours ago (at time of writing this post) ![]() I keep thinking there's something wrong with it though, but I just can't figure out what it is Awesome job there, its not easy to get a sense of scale to a sky, personally I would say to involve more of the land into the picture, at the moment it kinda looks like its just poking in at the bottom, when instead it could be used to give more perspective to the photo. Kinda like bottom third is land then top two thirds sky, might would need more photos to make it work but i think itd make it better. Good job anyway. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2007, 02:19 PM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Forum Addict ![]() Group: Basic Arbiters Posts: 1,801 Joined: 21-September 06 From: Shanklin, Isle of Wight Member No.: 107 |
Hmm, maybe you're right. I think next time i'll add more land to the shot
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2007, 10:03 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() WD PS3 Clan Leader ![]() Group: Basic Arbiters Posts: 3,107 Joined: 3-May 07 From: London Member No.: 238 |
Yes, you should have used the rule of thirds on that picture, it would have looked much better. There isn't enough land to set the sky off quite well enough
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 02:24 PM |